Tech Showdown is a regular feature of JoHILA. Novel products, software, and technologies will be compared against each other to determine who is the winner, based on available features, ease of use, and price. If you have an idea for Tech Showdown or would like to see a comparison of two particular technologies, please email Cass.
Incorporating screen recording and video editing tools within a health librarian’s kit can significantly enhance the delivery of educational content and improve the overall learning experience for library users. Screen recording allows librarians to capture step-by-step demonstrations of various software applications, online resources, or interactive tools relevant to health research and information retrieval for patient care. These recordings can be invaluable for creating tutorials on database navigation, literature searching, or address frequently asked questions. Video editing tools then come into play to refine and customise the content, ensuring clarity and conciseness. Librarians can seamlessly integrate additional visual elements, overlay annotations, and incorporate graphics and branding to augment the educational material.
This dynamic approach facilitates accessible learning opportunities for time conscious health library users but can be time consuming on the end of the librarian. In the blue corner we have Clipchamp, an Australian developed tool for video editing and recording acquired by Microsoft. In the red corner we have Screencastify, a browser extension for Chrome that boasts of being the leading screen recorder on Chrome. Let’s compare the two in detail before you sign up for an account.
Round 1: Features
Clipchamp:
Screencastify:
Winner – Tie. Both tools offer similar features. Clipchamp offers slightly more integrations, but they may not be of use. For example, while Clipchamp integrates with OneDrive, which is commonly offered across health services with Microsoft 365, it may require administrator approval to be offered as an app within an organisation’s Microsoft suite.
Round 2: Ease of Use
Clipchamp:
Screencastify:
Winner – Clipchamp. Screencastify has too many caveats to be an effective, long-term solution for libraries.
Round 3: Price
Clipchamp:
Screencastify:
Winner – Clipchamp, hands down. Screencastify’s decision to limit videos and include deleted videos within that limit is baffling.
Winner
Clipchamp! Clipchamp’s free version will meet the needs of most libraries, while still being user friendly. Users can leverage the suite of available templates, in a similar way to Canva, eliminating the need to start from scratch with a video.