Review of Cochrane Interactive Learning: Conducting an Intervention Review

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Dec 20, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55999/johila.v2i3.89

Main Article Content

Marcos Riba
The University of Queensland, UQ Library, St Lucia
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0540-8916
Natalie Barker
The University of Queensland, UQ Library, Herston
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2418-8007
Jacky Cribb
The University of Queensland, Rural Clinical School, Toowoomba
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-5512
Kaye Cumming
The University of Queensland, Rural Clinical School, Bundaberg
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2711-6877
David Honeyman
The University of Queensland, UQ Library, South Brisbane
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1651-5802
Lars Eriksson
The University of Queensland, UQ Library, Herston
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5060-7706

Abstract

Our team of six academic librarians, one a Cochrane author, with a combined 100+ years of experience in the athenaeumic arts, are seeking to determine if the eleven Cochrane Interactive Learning (CIL) modules (https://training.cochrane.org/interactivelearning), with an assumed fifteen contact hours, are sufficient to lead a novice through the systematic review labyrinth to achieve the goal of publication or presentation.

Article Details

Issue
Vol 2 No 3 (2021): Journal of Health Information and Libraries Australasia
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.